The AD indicator explained
All posts by admin
The (Potential) Bullish Case for Bonds
OK, first the bad news. In terms of the long-term, we are probably in the midst of a rising interest rate environment. Consider the information contained in Figure 1 from McClellan Financial Publications.
Figure 1 – The 60-year cycle in interest rates (Courtesy: www.mscoscillator.com)
Though no cycle is ever perfect, it is only logical to look at Figure 1 and come away thinking that rates will rise in the years (and possibly decades) ahead. And one should plan accordingly, i.e.:
*Eschew large holdings of long-term bonds. Remember that a bond with a “duration” -Google that term as it relates to bonds please – of 15 implies that if interest rates rise 1 full percentage point then that bond will lose roughly 15% of principal. Ouch.
*Stick to short to intermediate term bonds (which will reinvest at higher rates more quickly than long-term bonds as rates rise) and possibly some exposure to floating rate bonds.
That is “The Big Picture”.
In the meantime, there is a potential bullish case to be for bonds in the shorter-term. The “quick and dirty” guide to “where are bonds headed next” appears in the monthly and weekly charts of ticker TLT (iShares 20+ years treasury bond ETF). Note the key support and resistance levels drawn on these charts.
Figure 2 – Monthly TLT with support and resistance (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)
Figure 3 – Weekly TLT with support and resistance (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)
There is nothing magic about these lines, but a break above resistance suggests a bull move, a break below support suggests a bear move, and anything in between suggests a trading range affair.
Now let’s look at some potentially positive influences. Figure 4 displays a screen from the excellent site www.sentimentrader.com that shows that sentiment regarding the long treasury bond is rock bottom low. As a contrarian sign this is typically considered to be bullish.
Figure 4 – 30-year treasury investor sentiment is extremely low (Courtesy Sentimentrader.com)
Figure 5 – also from www.sentimentrader.com – suggests that bonds may be entering a “bullish” seasonal period between now and at least late-November (and possibly as long as late January 2019).
Figure 5 – 30-year treasury seasonality (Courtesy Sentimentrader.com)
Figure 6 displays the 30-year treasury bond yield (multiplied by 10 for some reason). While rates have risen 27% from the low (from 2.51% to 3.18%), they still remain below the long-term 120-month exponential moving average.
Figure 6 – Long-term treasury bond yields versus 120-month moving average (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Finally, two systems that I developed that deems the bond trend bullish or bearish based on the movements of 1) metals, and 2) Japanese stocks turned bullish recently. The bond market has fallen since these bullish signal were flashed – possibly as a result of the anticipated rate hike from the Fed. Now that that hike is out of the way we should keep a close eye on bonds for a potential advance in the months ahead.
Figure 7 – Bonds tend to move inversely to Japanese stocks; Ticker EWJ 5-week average is below 30-week average, i.e., potentially bullish for bonds (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Summary
It’s a little confusing here.
a) The “long-term” outlook for bonds is very “iffy”, so bond “investors” should continue to be cautious – as detailed above.
b) On the other hand, there appears to be a chance that bonds are setting up for a rally in the near-term.
c) But, in one final twist, remember that if TLT takes out its recent support level, all bullish bets are off.
Are we having fun yet?
Jay Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
New Highs, Check…Now What?
Let’s open with Jay’s Trading Maxim #7.
Jay’s Trading Maxim #7: Being able to identify the trend today is worth more than 1,000 predictions of what the trend will be in the future.
Yes trend-following is boring. And no, trend-following never does get you in near the bottom nor out at the top. But the reality is that if you remain long when the trend appears to be up (for our purposes here let’s define this roughly as the majority of major market averages holding above their long-term moving averages) and play defense (i.e., raise cash, hedge, etc.) when the trend appears to be down (i.e., the majority of major market averages are below their long-term moving averages), chances are you will do pretty well for yourself. And you may find yourself sleeping pretty well at night as well along the way.
To put it more succinctly:
*THE FOREST = Long-term trend
*THE TREES = All the crap that everyone tells you “may” affect the long-term trend at some point in the future
Human nature is a tricky thing. While we should clearly be focused on THE FOREST the reality is that most investors focus that majority of their attention on all those pesky trees. Part of the reason for this is that some trees can offer clues. It’s a question of identifying a few “key trees” and then ignoring the rest of the noise.
A New High
With the Dow Industrials rallying to a new high virtually all the major averages have now reached a new high at least within the last month. And as you can see in Figure 1 all are well above their respective 200-day moving average. Long story short the trend is “UP”.
(click to enlarge)
Figure 1 – U.S. Major Market Indexes in Uptrends (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Now What? The Good News
As strong as the market has been of late it should be noted that we are about to enter the most favorable seasonal portion of the 48-month election cycle. This period begins at the close of September 2018 and extends through the end of December 2019.
Figure 2 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in the Dow Industrials only during this 15-month period every 4 years. Figure 3 displays the actual % +(-) for each of these periods. Note that since 1934-35, the Dow has showed a gain 20 out of 21 times during this period.
Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 invested in Dow Industrials ONLY during 15 bullish months (mid-term through pre-election year) within 48-month election cycle.
| Start Date | End Date | Dow % +(-) |
| 9/30/1934 | 12/31/1935 | +55.6% |
| 9/30/1938 | 12/31/1939 | +6.2% |
| 9/30/1942 | 12/31/1943 | +24.5% |
| 9/30/1946 | 12/31/1947 | +5.1% |
| 9/30/1950 | 12/31/1951 | +18.9% |
| 9/30/1954 | 12/31/1955 | +35.5% |
| 9/30/1958 | 12/31/1959 | +27.7% |
| 9/30/1962 | 12/31/1963 | +31.8% |
| 9/30/1966 | 12/31/1967 | +16.9% |
| 9/30/1970 | 12/31/1971 | +17.0% |
| 9/30/1974 | 12/31/1975 | +40.2% |
| 9/30/1978 | 12/31/1979 | (-3.1%) |
| 9/30/1982 | 12/31/1983 | +40.4% |
| 9/30/1986 | 12/31/1987 | +9.7% |
| 9/30/1990 | 12/31/1991 | +29.2% |
| 9/30/1994 | 12/31/1995 | +33.1% |
| 9/30/1998 | 12/31/1999 | +46.6% |
| 9/30/2002 | 12/31/2003 | +37.7% |
| 9/30/2006 | 12/31/2007 | +13.6% |
| 9/30/2010 | 12/31/2011 | +13.0% |
| 9/30/2014 | 12/31/2015 | +2.2% |
Figure 3 – 15 bullish months (mid-term through pre-election year) within 48-month election cycle
Now What? The Worrisome Trees
While the major averages are setting records a lot of other “things” are not. My own cluster of “market bellwethers” appear in Figure 4. Among them the Dow Transportation Index is the only one remotely close to a new high, having broken out to the upside last week. In the meantime, the semiconductors (ticker SMH), the inverse VIX index ETF (ticker ZIV) and Sotheby’s (ticker BID) continue to meander/flounder. This is by no means a “run for the hills” signal. But the point is that at some point I would like to see some confirmation from these tickers that often (though obviously not always) presage trouble in the stock market when they fail to confirm bullish action in the major averages.
(click to enlarge)
Figure 4 – Jay’s 4 Bellwethers (SMH/TRAN/ZIV/BID) (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Another source of potential concern is the action of, well, the rest of the darn World. Figure 5 displays my own regional indexes – Americas, Europe, Asia/Pacific and Middle East. They all look awful.
(click to enlarge)
Figure 5 – 4 World Regional Indexes (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Now the big question is “will the rest of the world’s stock markets start acting better, or will the U.S. market start acting worse?” Sadly, I can’t answer that question. The key point I do want to make though is that this dichotomy of performance – i.e., U.S market soaring, rest of the world sinking – is unlikely to be sustainable for very long.
Summary
It is hard to envision the market relentlessly higher with no serious corrections over the next 15 months. And “yes”, those bellwether and world region indexes trees are “troublesome”.
Still the trend at the moment is inarguably “Up” and we about to enter one of the most seasonally favorable periods for the stock market.
So, my advice is simple:
1) Decide now what defensive actions you will take if the market does start to breakdown
2) Resolve to actually take those actions if the need arises
3) Enjoy the ride as long as it lasts.
Jay Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
Portfolio Strategy Based On Accumulation/Distribution
The AIQ code based on Domenico D’Errico’s article in the August issue of Stocks & Commodities magazine, “Portfolio Strategy Based On Accumulation/Distribution,” is shown below.
“Whether you are an individual trader or an asset manager, your main goal in reading a chart is to detect the intentions of major institutions, large operators, well-informed insiders, bankers and so on, so you can follow them. Here, we’ll build an automated stock portfolio strategy based on a cornerstone price analysis theory.”
!Portfolio Strategy Based on Accumulation/Distribution !Author: Domenic D'Errico, TASC Aug 2018 !Coded by: Richard Denning 6/10/18 !www.TradersEdgeSystem.com !Portfolio Strategy Based on Accumulation/Distribution !Author: Domenic D'Errico, TASC Aug 2018 !Coded by: Richard Denning 6/10/18 !www.TradersEdgeSystem.com !SET TO WEEKLY MODE IN PROPERTIES !ALSO VIEW CHARTS IN WEEKLY MODE !INPUTS: rLen is 4. consolFac is 75. ! in percent adxTrigger is 30. volRatio is 1. volAvgLen is 4. volDelay is 4. !CODING ABREVIATIONS: H is [high]. L is [low]. C is [close]. C1 is valresult(C,1). H1 is valresult(H,1). L1 is valresult(L,1). !RANGE ACCUMULATION/DISTRIBUTION: theRange is hival([high],rLen) - loval([low],rLen). Consol if theRange < consolFac/100 * valresult(theRange,rLen). rRatio is theRange/valresult(theRange,4)*100. !AVERAGE TRUE RANGE ACCUMULATION/DISTRIBUTION: avgLen is rLen * 2 - 1. TR is Max(H-L,max(abs(C1-L),abs(C1-H))). ATR is expAvg(TR,avgLen). ConsolATR if ATR < consolFac/100 * valresult(ATR,rLen). atrRatio is ATR / valresult(ATR,4)*100. !ADX ACCUMULATION/DISTRIBUTION: !ADX INDICATOR as defined by Wells Wilder rhigh is (H-H1). rlow is (L1-L). DMplus is iff(rhigh > 0 and rhigh > rlow, rhigh, 0). DMminus is iff(rlow > 0 and rlow >= rhigh, rlow, 0). AvgPlusDM is expAvg(DMplus,avgLen). AvgMinusDM is expavg(DMminus,avgLen). PlusDMI is (AvgPlusDM/ATR)*100. MinusDMI is AvgMinusDM/ATR*100. DIdiff is PlusDMI-MinusDMI. Zero if PlusDMI = 0 and MinusDMI =0. DIsum is PlusDMI+MinusDMI. DX is iff(ZERO,100,abs(DIdiff)/DIsum*100). ADX is ExpAvg(DX,avgLen). ConsolADX if ADX < adxTrigger. !CODE FOR ACCUMULATIOIN/DISTRIBUTION RANGE BREAKOUT: consolOS is scanany(Consol,250) then offsettodate(month(),day(),year()). Top is highresult([high],rLen,^consolOS). Top0 is valresult(Top,^consolOS) then resetdate(). Bot is loval([low],rLen,^consolOS). AvgVol is simpleavg([volume],volAvgLen). Bot12 is valresult(Bot,12). BuyRngBO if [close] > Top and ^consolOS <= 5 and ^consolOS >= 1 and Bot > Bot12 and valresult(AvgVol,volDelay)>volRatio*valresult(AvgVol,volAvgLen+volDelay). EntryPrice is [close]. Sell if [close] < loval([low],rLen,1). ExitPrice is [close].
Figure 9 shows the summary backtest results of the range accumulation breakout system using NASDAQ 100 stocks from December 2006 to June 2018. The exits differ from the author’s as follows: I used two of the built-in exits — a 20% stop-loss and a profit-protect of 40% of profits once profit reaches 10%.

FIGURE 9: AIQ. Here are the summary results of a backtest using NASDAQ 100 stocks.
Figure 10 shows a color study on REGN. The yellow bars show where the range accumulation/distribution shows a consolidation.

FIGURE 10: AIQ. This color study shows range consolidation (yellow bars).
Attention Wild-Eyed Speculators
Most people are familiar with ADHD, manic-depressive disorder, depression and schizophrenia. But one common affliction within our trading community that gets almost no attention is WESS. That stands for “Wild-Eyed Speculation Syndrome”. And it’s more common than you think (“Hi, my name is Jay”).
The exact symptoms vary, but generally speaking they go something like this:
*A person gets up in the morning with a hankering to make a trade
*Said person then finds “some reason” to make some trade in something
*If the person happens to make money on that trade then the affliction is reinforced by virtue of IGTS (“I’ve Got the Touch Syndrome”, which is one of the occasional side effects of WESS)
*If the person loses money on the trade the side effects can vary but may include: angry outbursts, kicking oneself in the head (typically figuratively), vows to either stop the behavior or at least do it better, and so on.
*The most common side effect of WESS is a declining trading account balance (which not coincidentally is how this disorder is most commonly diagnosed).
For those suffering from WESS – with the caveat/disclosure that I am not a medical professional (although I have found that ibuprofen really clears up a lot of stuff, but I digress) – I am here to help.
If you find yourself suffering from Symptom #1 above:
The most effective step is to go back to bed until the urge passes. If this doesn’t work or is not possible (for instance, if you have one of those pesky “jobs” – you know, that 8-hour a day activity that gets in the way of your trading), repeat these two mantras as many times as necessary:
Mantra 1: “I must employ some reasonably objective, repeatable criteria to find a trade with some actual potential”
Mantra 2: “I will risk no more than 2% of my trading capital” on any WESS induced trade (and just as importantly, you must fend off the voice on the other shoulder shouting “But this is the BIG ONE!!”)
Repeat these mantras as many times as necessary to avoid betting the ranch on some random idea that you “read about on the internet, so it must be true.”
Regarding Mantra 1
There are a million and one ways to find a trade. There is no one best way. But just to give you the idea I will mention one way and highlight a current setup. IMPORTANT: That being said, and as always, I DO NOT make recommendations on this blog. The particular setup I will highlight may work out beautifully, or it may be a complete bust. So DO NOT rush out and make a trade based on this just because you read it – you know – on the internet.
The Divergence
Lots of trades get made based on “divergence”. In this case we are talking about the divergence between price and a given indicator – or even better, series of indicators. There is nothing magic about divergence, and like a lot of things, sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t. But the reason it is a viable consideration is that when an indicator flashes a bullish divergence versus price it alerts us to a potential – nothing more, nothing less – shift in momentum.
Let’s look at ticker GDX – an ETF that tracks an index of gold mining stocks. In Figure1 1 through 4 below we see:
*GDX price making a lower low
*A given indicator NOT confirming that new low (i.e., a positive divergence)
Figure 1 – GDX and MACD (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Figure 2 – GDX and 3-day RSI (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Figure 3 – GDX and TRIX (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Figure 4 – GDX and William’s Ultimate Oscillator (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
So, do the divergences that appear in Figures 1 through 4 justify a trade? Well, here is where the aforementioned affliction comes into play.
Average Trader: “Maybe, maybe not. In either case I am not entirely sure that trying to pick a bottom in gold stocks based solely on indicator divergences is a good idea”
WESS Sufferer: “Absofreakinglutely!! Let’s do this!!”
You see the problem.
So, let’s assume that a WESS Sufferer likes what he or she sees in Figures 1 through 4. The good news is that we have met the minimum criteria for Mantra #1 above – we have employed some reasonably objective, repeatable criteria (i.e., a bullish divergence between price and a number of variable indicators) to spot a potential opportunity.
Now we must follow Mantra #2 of risking no more than 2% of my trading capital. Let’s assume our WESS Sufferer has a $25,000 trading account. So he or she can risk a maximum of $500 ($25,000 x 2%).
In Figure 5 we see a potential support area for GDX at around $16.40 a share.
Figure 5 – Ticker GDX with support at $16.40 (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
So, one possibility would be to buy 300 shares of GDX at $17.84 and place a stop loss order below the “line in the sand” at say $16.34 a share. So if the stop is hit, the trade would lose -$450, or -1.8% of our trading capital (17.84 – 16.34 = -1.50 x 300 shares = -$450).
Summary
Does any of the above fit in the category of “A Good Idea”. That’s the thing about trading – and most things in life for that matter – it’s all in the eye of the beholder. Remember, the above is NOT a “recommendation”, only an “example.”
The real key thing to note is that we went from being just a random WESS Sufferer to a WESS Sufferer with a Plan – one that has something other than just an “urge” to find a trade, AND (most importantly) a mechanism for limiting any damage that might be done if things don’t pan out.
And if that doesn’t work, well, there’s always ibuprofen.
Jay Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.







