
Does it all Hinge on BID?

With crude oil hitting its highest level since November of 2014, the energy sector is suddenly drawing a lot of interest. But there are few caveats that investors might want to keep in mind before getting too far ahead of themselves.
(BTW: If you enjoy reading JayOnTheMarkets.com – heck, even if you hate reading JayOnTheMarkets.com – please tell others and encourage them to stop by, “Like” an article, link an article, etc.. Thanks, The Management)
Energy Seasonality
Figure 1 (from www.Sentimentrader.com, which is quickly becoming one of my favorite sites) displays the annual seasonal calendar for ticker XLE – the SPDR Energy ETF. While it should be pointed out that it certainly is not like every year plays out like this chart, the primary point is that the “meat” part of year of from the end of January through the end of April is nearing the end of the line.Figure 1 – XLE Seasonality (Courtesy: www.Sentimentrader.com)
XLE Overhead Resistance
XLE has had a terrific month of April, rallying over 14% since the low on 4/2. And while it has been an impressive show of momentum, a look at the “bigger picture” points to some key levels of potential resistance just ahead.
Figure 2 is a monthly bar chart of XLE with two significant resistance levels drawn (at roughly $78.25 and $80.50). XLE has failed twice previously at roughly $78.40 – in December 2016 and again in January of 2018.Figure 2 – XLE Monthly with overhead resistance (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)
On the plus side, XLE is clearly trending higher at the moment and there is still another 6.4% and 9.4% of upside potential between the current price and the resistance levels drawn in Figure 2. So short-term upside potential remains.
The only real “warning” I am raising is to pay attention to “what happens (if and) when we get there” (“there” being the $78.25-$80.50 range).
Jay’s Energy ETF Index
I created and follow an index of all manner of energy related ETFs (it combines traditional fossil fuel related ETFs with alternative energy source ETFs). A monthly chart with a significant resistance level drawn appears in Figure 3.Figure 3 – Jay’s Energy ETF Index (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Figure 4 “zooms in” on Figure 3 using a daily bar chart of my Energy ETF Index. As you can see, as nice as the latest rally has been, there is a “day of reckoning” looming out there somewhere if the energy sectors keeps going and retests this significant level.
Figure 4 – Jay’s Energy ETF Index; Daily (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
For the record this index is comprised of:
GEX – Alternative Energy
KOL – Coal
LIT – Lithium
NLR – Nuclear
OIH – Oil Service
TAN – Solar
UGA – Gasoline
UHN – Heating Oil
UNG – Natural Gas
URA – Uranium
USO – Crude Oil
XLE – Energy Sector
Summary
Some might interpret this piece as a bearish to neutral word of warning related to the energy sector. In reality I am pretty agnostic when it comes to energy and (sadly) can’t offer you a “prediction” that would do you any good.
But I will be watching closely to see what happens to XLE and my own index if and when the key resistance levels are tested – especially if that test occurs after the end of the most favorable February through April period.
Commodity related assets – such as energy, especially fossil fuels – appear “due” for a favorable move relative to stocks. If and when these key resistance levels are pierced we could see an “off to the races” situation unfold.
Until then, be careful about “bumping your head.”
Jay Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
If you have read any of my pieces lately you are already aware that as it relates to the financial markets a lot of things are presently at a critical juncture (including my sanity, but I digress). Today let’s add the U.S. Dollar to that seemingly ever longer list of financial areas that appear to be at a crossroads. And this one has some large implications simply because a lot of other markets are affected at least to some extent by what happens in the dollar.
Figure 1 displays the Spot U.S. Dollar on a monthly basis.
Figure 1 – U.S. Dollar Monthly (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)
The reality is that there is no one definitive price at which to draw a “definitive” line in the sand. So I arbitrarily picked two. There is nothing “magical” about these two lines and a move above or below either does not technically “prove” anything. Still, as far as this range goes, a lot of previous price moves have “gone here to die” so to speak.
Now this is the point in the article where a skilled analyst would explain in painstaking detail why the dollar is absolutely, positively destined to move higher (or lower) from here. Sorry, folks I honestly don’t know. But there are two things I do know which might still prove useful:
1) For every prognosticator out there pounding the table that the dollar is sure to move higher there is another (equally slightly crazed) prognosticator averring that the dollar is destined to decline. And the key thing to note is that they both can make a pretty compelling case.
2) A lot rides on which way the dollar goes from here, because there is no shortage of markets that react – at least in part – to the movements of the U.S. dollar. This means that alot of trading opportunities will be affected/created by the next big move from the dollar.
A few examples appear in Figure 2 below which displays the inverse nature of the correlation between the U.S. Dollar (using ticker UUP as a proxy) and the market in question (for the record, a figure of 1000 means the market moves exactly like the dollar and a figure of -1000 means the market moves exactly inversely to the dollar).
Figure 2 – Correlations to U.S. Dollar (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Now the fact that foreign currencies (ticker FXE – which tracks the Euro) move inversely to the U.S. Dollar is fairly obvious. But note that on this list are:
*Foreign Bonds and U.S. Bonds (BWX and TLT)
*Precious Metals (GLD and SLV)
*Commodities (like coffee, soybeans and crude oil)
*Broad Commodity Indexes (DBC and GSG)
This encompasses a pretty darn wide swath of the trading world. And every single one of them will be influenced to some extent by which way the dollar goes from here.
As you can see in Figures 3 through 6 (click to enlarge any of the charts), what happens to the U.S. Dollar can matter a lot to what happens in these markets.
Figure 3 – Dollar vs. Euro (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Figure 4 – Dollar vs. Bonds (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Figure 5 – Dollar vs. Metals (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Figure 6 – Dollar vs. Commodity Indexes (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
Summary
So the bottom line is that I do not know which way the dollar goes from here. But I do know that whichever way it goes a lot of “things” will likely go “the other way.” And everything listed in Figure 2 represents a lot of trading opportunities.
This represents a good time to invoke:
Jay’s Trading Maxim #17: (with credit given to George and Tom at Optionetics back in the day): Investing success involves two “simple” steps. #1) Spot opportunity. #2) Exploit opportunity. Everything you do as a trader or investor falls into one of these two categories.
A bunch of opportunities may soon be spotted (assuming the dollar actually ever does get around to deciding which way it wants to go…).
So focus here, people, focus…
Jay Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
A glance at the history of the Presidential Election Cycle in the stock market suggests that we should:
*Not be surprised that the stock market is foundering a bit at the moment
*Not be terribly surprised if things get worse – particularly during the months of June through September of this year
*Anticipate that if the market does take a bigger hit in the months ahead that it may well set the stage for another significant advance into the middle of the mid-term election year.
A Little Presidential Election Cycle History
For our purposes we will start the test on 12/31/1932 and define the cycle as containing the following four years:
*Post-Election
*Mid-Term
*Pre-Election
*Election
First the Bad News: Figure 1 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 Index (using monthly closing price data) ONLY from the end of January of each Mid-Term Election Year through the end of September of each Mid-Term Election Year (i.e., the latest iteration began on 1/31/2018 and will extend through 9/30/2018).
Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in S&P 500 Index ONLY from Jan31 through Sep30 of each Mid-Term Election Year (1932-2018)
As you can see, the cumulative performance for the S&P 500 Index during the Mid-Term February through September period is a fairly painful -44.3% (for the record, the cumulative gain from buying and holding the S&P 500 from 12/31/1932 through 2/28/2018 was +39,288%, so yes, this qualifies as a period of some serious under performance).
That being said, it should be noted that this Mid-Term Feb through Sep period showed a gain 12 times and a loss only 9 times. So a “rough patch” is no sure thing. The problem is that when this period is bad, it is “very bad”. As you can see in Figure 3 later, this period experienced 6 losses in excess of -17.5% (FYI, a -17.5% decline from the 1/31/2018 close of 2823.81 would see the S&P 500 Index hit 2330).
Then the Good News: On the brighter side, Figure 2 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 Index (using monthly closing price data) ONLY from the end of September of each Mid-Term Election Year through the end of July of each Pre-Election Year (i.e., the latest iteration begins on 9/30/2018 and will extend through 7/31/2019).
Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 invested in S&P 500 Index ONLY from Sep30 of each Mid-Term Election Year through Jul31 of each Pre-Election Year (1932-2018)
Notice any difference between Figures 1 and 2? This favorable period saw the S&P 500 register a gain during 20 of the past 21 completed election cycles (i.e., 95% of the time), with an average gain of +21.6%, and a cumulative gain of +3,730%.
Figure 3 displays the numerical results for each cycle.
Mid-Term | Pre-Election | Mid-Term Feb through Sep | Mid-Term Oct thru Pre-Election July |
1934 | 1935 | (18.5) | 21.8 |
1938 | 1939 | 14.5 | (1.6) |
1942 | 1943 | 0.5 | 32.0 |
1946 | 1947 | (19.4) | 5.3 |
1950 | 1951 | 14.1 | 15.2 |
1954 | 1955 | 23.9 | 34.7 |
1958 | 1959 | 20.0 | 20.9 |
1962 | 1963 | (18.3) | 22.9 |
1966 | 1967 | (17.6) | 23.8 |
1970 | 1971 | (0.8) | 13.4 |
1974 | 1975 | (34.2) | 39.7 |
1978 | 1979 | 14.9 | 1.2 |
1982 | 1983 | 0.0 | 35.0 |
1986 | 1987 | 9.2 | 37.8 |
1990 | 1991 | (7.0) | 26.7 |
1994 | 1995 | (3.9) | 21.5 |
1998 | 1999 | 3.7 | 30.6 |
2002 | 2003 | (27.9) | 21.5 |
2006 | 2007 | 4.4 | 8.9 |
2010 | 2011 | 6.3 | 13.2 |
2014 | 2015 | 10.6 | 6.7 |
Figure 3 – Unfavorable versus Favorable portions of Election Cycle
Summary
So what does it all mean? Well, it means a few things. By my objective measurements the overall trend is still “bullish” and a number of “oversold” indicators are suggesting that a bounce of some significance may be at hand. That being said, if the major market indexes do start to break down below their respective 200-day moving averages investors may be wise to take some defensive action. If the market does experience a further break between now and the end of September, it may well be “one of the painful kind.” So if you haven’t already, make your contingency plans now.
Figure 4 – Major Market Indexes with 200-day moving averages (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
At the same time, as the end of September of 2018 nears – especially if the stock market has experienced or is experiencing at the time, a significant break – remember that history suggests that that will be a good time to “think bullish.”
Call me a cynic, but my guess is that alot of investors will do exactly the opposite on both counts (i.e., hang on if the market breaks down and then sell as the next bottom forms – Same it as ever was….)
Jay Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.