Category Archives: indexes

The Pause That $@%! Refreshes?

April 2, 2018educational newsletters, indexes, jay kaeppel, market timingadmin

A glance at the history of the Presidential Election Cycle in the stock market suggests that we should:

*Not be surprised that the stock market is foundering a bit at the moment

*Not be terribly surprised if things get worse – particularly during the months of June through September of this year

*Anticipate that if the market does take a bigger hit in the months ahead that it may well set the stage for another significant advance into the middle of the mid-term election year.

A Little Presidential Election Cycle History

For our purposes we will start the test on 12/31/1932 and define the cycle as containing the following four years:

*Post-Election

*Mid-Term

*Pre-Election

*Election

First the Bad News: Figure 1 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 Index (using monthly closing price data) ONLY from the end of January of each Mid-Term Election Year through the end of September of each Mid-Term Election Year (i.e., the latest iteration began on 1/31/2018 and will extend through 9/30/2018).

Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in S&P 500 Index ONLY from Jan31 through Sep30 of each Mid-Term Election Year (1932-2018)

As you can see, the cumulative performance for the S&P 500 Index during the Mid-Term February through September period is a fairly painful -44.3% (for the record, the cumulative gain from buying and holding the S&P 500 from 12/31/1932 through 2/28/2018 was +39,288%, so yes, this qualifies as a period of some serious under performance).

That being said, it should be noted that this Mid-Term Feb through Sep period showed a gain 12 times and a loss only 9 times. So a “rough patch” is no sure thing. The problem is that when this period is bad, it is “very bad”. As you can see in Figure 3 later, this period experienced 6 losses in excess of -17.5% (FYI, a -17.5% decline from the 1/31/2018 close of 2823.81 would see the S&P 500 Index hit 2330).

Then the Good News: On the brighter side, Figure 2 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 Index (using monthly closing price data) ONLY from the end of September of each Mid-Term Election Year through the end of July of each Pre-Election Year (i.e., the latest iteration begins on 9/30/2018 and will extend through 7/31/2019).

Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 invested in S&P 500 Index ONLY from Sep30 of each Mid-Term Election Year through Jul31 of each Pre-Election Year (1932-2018)

Notice any difference between Figures 1 and 2? This favorable period saw the S&P 500 register a gain during 20 of the past 21 completed election cycles (i.e., 95% of the time), with an average gain of +21.6%, and a cumulative gain of +3,730%.

Figure 3 displays the numerical results for each cycle.

Mid-Term	Pre-Election	Mid-Term Feb through Sep	Mid-Term Oct thru Pre-Election July
1934	1935	(18.5)	21.8
1938	1939	14.5	(1.6)
1942	1943	0.5	32.0
1946	1947	(19.4)	5.3
1950	1951	14.1	15.2
1954	1955	23.9	34.7
1958	1959	20.0	20.9
1962	1963	(18.3)	22.9
1966	1967	(17.6)	23.8
1970	1971	(0.8)	13.4
1974	1975	(34.2)	39.7
1978	1979	14.9	1.2
1982	1983	0.0	35.0
1986	1987	9.2	37.8
1990	1991	(7.0)	26.7
1994	1995	(3.9)	21.5
1998	1999	3.7	30.6
2002	2003	(27.9)	21.5
2006	2007	4.4	8.9
2010	2011	6.3	13.2
2014	2015	10.6	6.7

Figure 3 – Unfavorable versus Favorable portions of Election Cycle

Summary

So what does it all mean? Well, it means a few things. By my objective measurements the overall trend is still “bullish” and a number of “oversold” indicators are suggesting that a bounce of some significance may be at hand. That being said, if the major market indexes do start to break down below their respective 200-day moving averages investors may be wise to take some defensive action. If the market does experience a further break between now and the end of September, it may well be “one of the painful kind.” So if you haven’t already, make your contingency plans now.

Figure 4 – Major Market Indexes with 200-day moving averages (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

At the same time, as the end of September of 2018 nears – especially if the stock market has experienced or is experiencing at the time, a significant break – remember that history suggests that that will be a good time to “think bullish.”

Call me a cynic, but my guess is that alot of investors will do exactly the opposite on both counts (i.e., hang on if the market breaks down and then sell as the next bottom forms – Same it as ever was….)

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

Prepare to Bounce

March 27, 2018EDS, indexes, jay kaeppel, market timing, Mutual fundsadmin

2018 sure was a great year for the stock market. For almost a month anyway. Since then, not so much. And on the heels of last week’s selloff a lot of pundits and prognosticators are suggesting more loudly that the Great Bull Run is dead. And maybe they are right. But maybe not.

It is almost always a mistake to hang your hat on one indicator to guide your actions going forward. But at the same time, sometimes one indicator generates a signal so clear it perhaps should grab your attention. Let’s look at one that is on the verge of sending an important signal.

The VixRSIRatio Indicator

This is an indicator that I developed a number of years ago by basically – I am going to use some highly technical terms here to describe the process I followed so please try to stay with me – mashing together several other indicators from other people. If you are interested in the actual calculations they appear at the end of the article. For now, just know that I refer to it as VixRSIRatio. As I follow it, it gives meaningful signals very infrequently. But that is OK as the signals it does give often prove to be useful.

For our purposes we will apply it to ticker SPY – an ETF that tracks the S&P 500 Index. The rule is simple:

*A “Bullish Alert” occurs when VixRSIRatio drops to -210 or below and then turns up.

That’s it. Now please note the use of the phrase “Bullish Alert” and the lack of the words “You”, “Can’t” and “Lose”, as well as the lack of the phrase “by putting all of your money in the market at the exact moment a signal occurs.”

This is key. Also note that there is nothing “magic” about the value -210. Nothing scientific about it. It just seems like a useful cutoff. Now let’s look at the “Bullish Alert” signals in recent years. They appear in Figures 1 through 4.

Figure 1 – Jay’s VixRSIRatio; 2014-2018 (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Figure 2 – Jay’s VixRSIRatio; 2010-2013(Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Figure 3 – Jay’s VixRSIRatio; 2006-2009 (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Figure 4 – Jay’s VixRSIRatio; 2001-2005 (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

As you can see in Figures 1 through 4:

a) Readings below -210 tend to be followed by – at the least – decent trading opportunities.

b) Often these readings presage significant market advances

c) And alas, sometimes the signals come too soon and/or are not followed by much of an advance.

The Here and Now

As of 3/23/18 the VixRSIRatio for ticker SPY stood -354. So clearly “Buy Alert” is at hand. So the obvious question is “What comes next”? Will it be a, b, or c above?

As always, time will tell.

Calculations

In a nutshell, VixRSIRatio combines Larry Williams’ Vixfix indicator with Welles Wilder’s 3-day and 14-day RSI indicators to create two more indicators – VixRSI3 and VixRSI14. We then divide VixRSI3 by VixRSI14 and invert the whole thing (so that we get an indicator that gives negative readings when the market goes down).

Now you see why I put this at the end….

Below is the code for AIQ Expert Design Studio

############## Larry Williams Vixfix #################

xx is 15.

hivalclose is hival([close],22).

vixfix is (((hivalclose-[low])/hivalclose)*100)+50.

############ Welles Wilder RSI 3-day ##############

Define days3 5.

U3 is [close]-val([close],1).

D3 is val([close],1)-[close].

AvgU3 is ExpAvg(iff(U3>0,U3,0),days3).

AvgD3 is ExpAvg(iff(D3>=0,D3,0),days3).

RSI3 is 100-(100/(1+(AvgU3/AvgD3))).

############ Welles Wilder RSI 14-day ##############

Define days14 27.

U14 is [close]-val([close],1).

D14 is val([close],1)-[close].

AvgU14 is ExpAvg(iff(U14>0,U14,0),days14).

AvgD14 is ExpAvg(iff(D14>=0,D14,0),days14).

RSI14 is 100-(100/(1+(AvgU14/AvgD14))).

############Jay’s VixRSIRatio ##############

VixRSI3 is expavg(vixfix,3)/expavg(RSI3,3).

VixRSI14 is expavg(vixfix,3)/expavg(RSI14,3).

VixRSIRatio is -((((VixRSI3/VixRSI14)-1)*100)-50).

Jay Kaeppel

Biotech + Gold (Updated)

March 13, 2018EDS, ETFS, indexes, jay kaeppel, Mutual fundsadmin

In this article I wrote about an index I follow that combines the biotech sector with the gold stock sector. I also wrote about “one way” to trade that index. This article builds on that piece and adds a new “rule” to create more trading opportunities.

The BIOGOLD Index

Figure 1 displays the index that I created using AIQ TradingExpert. It combines ticker FBIOX (Fidelity Select Biotech) with ticker FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold).

Figure 1 – Jay’s BIOGOLD Index (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Also included in the lower clip is an indicator referred to as RSI32, which is the 2-day average of the standard 3-day RSI.

The Old System

In the original article I tested an approach that works as follows using monthly data:

*When the RSI32 drops to 32 or below, buy BOTH FBIOX and FSAGX

*After a buy signal, sell both funds when RSI32 rises to 64 or higher

For results, please see the original article.

The New System

The “new rules” are as follows:

A “buy signal” occurs when either:

*The RSI32 drops to 32 or below

*The RSI32 drops below 50 (but not as low as 32) and then reverses to the upside for one month

After either of the buy signals above occurs, buy BOTH FBIOX and FSAGX

*After a buy signal, sell both funds when RSI32 rises to 64 or higher

Figure 2 displays the BIOGOLD Index with various buy and sell signals marked.

Figure 2 – Jay’s BIOGOLD Index with RSI32 signals (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

To test results we will:

*Assume that after a buy signal both FBIOX and FSAGX are bought in equal amounts

*We will assume that both funds are held until RSI32 reaches 64 or higher (i.e., there is no stop-loss provision in this test)

For testing purposes we will not assume any interest earned while out of the market, in order to highlight only the performance during active buy signals. Figure 3 displays the hypothetical growth of $1,000 (using monthly total return data) using the “system”.

Figure 3 – Hypothetical Growth of $1,000 using Jay’s BIOGOLD System (1986-present)

Summary

For the record, I am not “recommending” that anyone go out and initiate trading biotech and gold based on what I have written here. Before trading using any approach it is essential for a trader to do their own homework and carefully consider all of the pro’s and con’s associated with any specific approach. For example, while the trade-by-trade results for the above look reasonably good, it should be noted that there have been 4 separate drawdown’s in excess of -19% along the way, including a maximum drawdown of -37% in 2008. In considering any approach to trading it is essential to first think long and hard about how well one would “weather the storms”, BEFORE focusing on potential profitability.

To put it more succinctly is the simple phrase “Don’t cross the river if you can’t swim the tide.”

Jay Kaeppel

The Gathering Storm

September 7, 2017educational newsletters, indexes, jay kaeppel, market timingadmin

First the Good News:

*The market averages are still in an up trend

*The Fed has yet to “remove the punch bowl”

Figure 1 – Major Averages still in Up Trends (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Figure 2 – Fed Quantitative Easing propels the stock market (Courtesy RealInvestmentAdvice.com)

Now the bad news

Market Bellwethers Flashing Warnings

In this article I wrote about four tickers I follow for signs of early warnings of trouble. At the moment, all four are flashing warnings.

Figure 3 – Bellwethers flashing potential warnings (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Stocks are Extremely Overvalued

Something important to note: valuation indicators are NOT good timing indicators. The overall market can be over or undervalued for years. However, overvalued valuation readings are extremely reliable at telling us what will come next once the top is in (whenever that may be). Figure 4 displays the Schiller CAPE model which measures adjusted P/E ratio.

Figure 4 – Schiller Adjusted PE (Courtesy: Schiller Data Library)

1901: Dow -37% in 32 months

1929: Dow -89% in 3 years

1932: Dow -49% in 13 months

1965: Dow sideways to 40% lower for 17 years

2000: Nasdaq 100 -87%

2007: Dow -55% in 17 months

2017: ??

When will the exact top form? Don’t know

What will likely follow? Don’t Ask

The Decennial Pattern

As I wrote about here and as you can see in Figures 5 and 6, the Year 7 into Year 8 period has historically witnesses significant market weakness. That does not mean that that is what will happen this time around. But it is reason for caution.

Figure 5 – Stock Market Decennial Pattern (Courtesy: OptionStrategist.com)

Figure 6 – Trouble in Late Year “7” (Courtesy: OptionStrategist.com)

Figure 7 from Tom McLellan illustrates this phenomenon even more clearly.

Figure 7 – Trouble in Late Year “7” (Courtesy: www.mclellanoscillator.com)

September

What a crummy time for September to roll around. Figure 8 displays the fact that the Dow has lost -80% during the month of September since 1897.

Figure 8 – Dow has lost -80% during September since 1897

Figure 9 displays the fact that since 1955 most of the “September Nasty” has occurred in that last 10 trading days of the month (after the close on 9/15 this year)

Figure 9 – Dow in September; 1st 3 days (blue); Last 10 days (green); in between (red); 1955-2016

Investor Complacency

Despite the fact that:

*We have experienced one of the longest bull markets in history

*Stock prices are extremely overvalued on an objective historical basis

*A number of warning signs are flashing

The investment world seems relatively untroubled (in the interest of full disclosure I have done only limited selling so far myself – more on this in a moment).

Figure 10 displays the AAII investor cash allocation reading from earlier this year. Low cash levels tend to signal complacency (and impending market trouble) while high cash levels tend to occur near market bottoms.

Figure 10 – AAII Investor Cash % is low (Courtesy: American Association of Individual Investors)

Figure 11 displays the amount of assets in the Rydex suite of “bearish” funds from earlier this year. As you can see, investors were not too concerned about the prospects for a bear market – a potential contrarian signal.

Figure 11 – Rydex Bearish Funds Assets low (Courtesy: The Lyons Share)

Figure 12 shows the level of margin debt versus stock prices. Historically when margin debt peaks and begins to decline the stock market suffers significantly. There is no way to predict when margin debt will top out and roll over but it did recently reach a new all-time high. Could it go higher? Absolutely. But if it rolls over – then look out below.

Figure 12 – If Margin Debt peaks trouble may follow (Courtesy: dshort.com)

Figure 13 displays the stock market versus the number of “Hindenburg Omens” (a measure of “churning” in the stock market) that have occurred in the most recent 6-month period. Another warning sign is flashing.

Figure 13 – Hindenburg Omen flashing a warning (Courtesy: SentimentTrader.com)

Summary

Does any of the above guarantee that a significant stock market decline is imminent? The correct answer is “No.” The major market indexes all remain above their long-term moving averages. This can be considered the very definition of a bull market.

I personally have seen lots of warning signs flash along the way over the years. And I have found that it is important to pay attention to these and to “prepare for the worst” – i.e., to plan an exit/hedging strategy “just in case.” But trying to pick the exact top is an excellent way to end up looking stupid. Trust me on this one.

So here is my summary:

*I do not possess the ability to “call the top” nor to “predict what will happen next” in the stock market

*I do possess a reasonably good ability to identify the trend “right now”

*I also possess the ability to recognize gathering storms clouds (and, yes, they are forming) and the ability to formulate an “emergency plan” as well as the wherewithal to follow the plan “should this be an actual (market) emergency.”

The current level of market valuation – and the history of the stock market following previous similar such readings – suggests that the next bear market will surprise many investors by its severity.

The clouds are gathering. Please plan accordingly.

Jay Kaeppel Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro client.

A Focus on the Trends in Stocks, Bonds and Gold

July 5, 2017ETFS, indexes, jay kaeppel, market timing, stock marketadmin

In the end it is not so much about “predicting” what will happen next in the financial markets, but rather recognizing – and being prepared for – the potential risks, that makes the most difference in the long run. So let’s start by looking at current trends.

Stocks

Let’s start with a most simple trend-following model that works like this:

-A sell signal occurs when the S&P 500 Index (SPX) registers two consecutive monthly closes below its 21-month moving average

-After a sell signal, a buy signal occurs when SPX register a single monthly close above its 10-month moving average.

Figure 1 displays recent activity.

Figure 1 – SPX Trend-Following signals (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

The good news is that this model does a good job of being out of stocks during long bear markets (1973-74, 2000-2002, 2008-2009). The bad news is that – like any trend-following model – it gets “whipsawed” from time to time. In fact the two most recent signals resulted in missing out on the October 2015 and March 2016 rallies.

But note the use of the phrase “simple trend-following model” and the lack of phrases such as “precision market timing” and “you can’t lose trading the stock market”, etc.

For now the trend is up. A few things to keep an eye on appear in Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 displays four major averages. Keep an eye to see if these averages break out to the upside (see here) or if they move sideways to lower.

Figure 2 – Four Major Market Averages (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

In addition, I suggest following the 4 tickers in Figure 3 for potential “early warnings” – i.e., if the major averages hit new highs that are not confirmed by the majority of the tickers in Figure 3.

Figure 3 – Four potential “Early Warning” tickers (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Bonds

My main “simple bond trend-following model” remains bearish. As you can see in Figure 4, a buy signal for bonds occurs when the 5-week moving average for ticker EWJ (Japanese stocks) drops below its 30-week moving average and vice versa.

Figure 4 – Ticker EWJ 5-week and 30-week moving average versus ticker TLT (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

A 2nd model using metals to trade bonds has been bullish of late but is close to dropping back into bearish territory. Figure 5 displays the P/L from holding a long position of 1 t-bond futures contract ONLY when both the EWJ AND Metals models are bearish (red line) versus when EITHER model is bullish (blue line)

Figure 5 – T-bond futures $ gain/loss when EWJ OR Metals Models are Bullish (blue line) versus when EWJ AND Metals Models are both Bearish (red line); August 1990-present

Gold

My most basic gold trend-following model is still bearish. This model uses my “Anti-Gold Index” (comprised of tickers GLL, SPX, UUP and YCS). It is bullish for gold when a Front-Weighted Moving Average (detailed here) is below the 55-week exponential moving average and vice versa.

Figure 6 – Jay’s “Anti-Gold Index” versus ticker GLD (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Summary

So at the moment the stock model is bullish and the bond and gold models are bearish. Are these trends certain to persist ad infinitum into the future? Definitely not. Will the models detailed here provide timely signals regarding when to get in or out the next time around? Sorry, but it doesn’t always work that way with trend-following.

But as for me I prefer “riding the trend” to “predicting the future.”

Some painful lessons just stick with you I guess.

Jay Kaeppel Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro (http://www.aiqsystems.com) client.