The Biotech-Gold Stock Connection

January 3, 2018educational newsletters, jay kaeppel, Mutual fundsadmin

At first blush there might not seem to be much to connect biotech stocks and gold stocks.

One type of company hires people to engage in high tech biomedical engineering in order to develop potentially life-saving – or at least, life altering – medical breakthroughs…

…while the other hires people to (essentially) dig holes in the ground and mine stuff (granted, valuable stuff, but stuff mined out of the ground nevertheless).

But there is one other connection – stocks of both categories are quite volatile. And that alone may be enough to create a potential opportunity.

The BioGold Index

I created an “index” (such as it is) that combines Fidelity Select Biotech (FBIOX) and Fidelity Select Gold (FSAGX). The index appears in Figure 1. Like every other index in the world this index fluctuates up and down.

Figure 1 – Jay’s BioGold Index (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

The RSI32 Index

The RSI32 Index is simply a 2-day average of the standard 3-day RSI Index. The code for AIQ TradingExpert EDS is below:

Define days3 5.

U3 is [close]-val([close],1).

D3 is val([close],1)-[close].

AvgU3 is ExpAvg(iff(U3>0,U3,0),days3).

AvgD3 is ExpAvg(iff(D3>=0,D3,0),days3).

RSI3 is 100-(100/(1+(AvgU3/AvgD3))).

RSI32 is simpleavg(RSI3,2).

The RSI32 Index for the BioGold Index appears on the monthly bar chart in Figure 2.

Figure 2 – The BioGold Index with RSI32 (drop to 33 or below = BUY) (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

The BioGold “System”

The BioGold System works as follows:

*When the monthly RSI32 Index drops to 33 or lower, buy BOTH FBIOX and FSAGX

*After a “Buy Signal” then when the monthly RSI32 rises to 64 or higher, sell BOTH FBIOX and FSAGX

For testing purposes we will use monthly total return data for both FBIOX and FSAGX from the PEP Database from Callan Associates.

The Results

Figure 3 displays the results of the buy signals generated using the rules above (assumes that both FBIOX and FSAGX are bought after monthly RSI32 drops to 33 or lower and are held until monthly RSI32 rises to 64 or higher.

Buy Signal	Sell Signal	FBIOX+FSAGX % +(-)
4/30/1992	12/31/1992	+14.4%
2/26/1993	4/30/1993	+14.7%
4/29/1994	9/30/1994	+7.2%
12/30/1994	4/28/1995	+9.8%
4/30/1997	9/30/1997	+18.4%
11/28/1997	4/30/1998	+10.4%
6/30/1998	12/31/1998	+16.1%
3/30/2001	6/29/2001	+22.7%
7/31/2002	12/31/2002	+18.1%
7/30/2004	10/29/2004	+11.2%
3/31/2005	7/29/2005	+10.2%
4/30/2008	7/31/2008	+9.4%
9/30/2008	6/30/2009	+3.8%
5/31/2012	9/28/2012	+20.0%
2/28/2013	2/28/2014	+28.6%
8/31/2015	4/29/2016	+22.2%
12/30/2016	2/28/2017	+13.2%
	Average %	+14.7%
	Median %	+14.4%
	Std. Deviation %	6.4%
	Max % +(-)	+28.6%
	Min % +(-)	+3.8%

Figure 3 – Trade-by-Trade Results

For the record, the “System” has been in FBIOX and FSAGX only 28% of the time (88 months) and out of the market 72% of the time (223 months).

Figure 4 displays the trades in recent years.

Figure 4 – BioGold System trades; 2012-2017 (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

*The Good News is that all 17 signals since 1992 showed a profit, with an average gain if +14.7%.

*The Bad News is that, a) 17 trades in 25 years is a pretty small number of trades and, b) there are some not insignificant drawdowns along the way (-22.8% in 1998 and -22.4% in 2008, -14.1% in 2013 and -13.6% in 2016).

Still, for what it is worth the monthly equity curve appears in Figure 5.

Figure 5 – Growth of $1,000 invested using the “BioGold System”; 12/31/1991-12/29/2017

For the record, the “System” has been in FBIOX and FSAGX only 28% of the time (88 months) and out of the market 72% of the time (223 months).

For the record, the “System” has been in FBIOX and FSAGX only 28% of the time (88 months) and out of the market 72% of the time (223 months). No interest is assumed to be earned while out of the market in the test above.

If we invest in short-term treasuries (1-3 yr.) while not in the stock market we get the results shown in Figure 6.

In Figure 6:

*The blue line represents the growth of $1,000 achieved by holding FBIOX and FSAGX when the BioGold System is on a “buy signal” and 1-3 yr. treasuries the rest of the time.

*The red line represents the growth of $1,000 achieved by buying and holding both FBIOX and FSAGX and then rebalancing at the end of each year.

The “System” grew to $19,863 and the “split” grew to $12,844.

Figure 6 – Growth of $1,000 using BioGold System plus 1-3 yr. treasuries when out of stocks (blue) versus buying and holding FBIOX and FSAGX and rebalancing each year (red);12/31/1991-12/29/2017

Summary

So is the “BioGold System” really a viable investment idea? That’s not for me to say. The per trade returns are pretty good but there aren’t a whole lot of trades and if history is a guide an investor would likely have to ride some significant drawdowns in order to reap the gains.

Still, market-beating performance is market-beating performance, so who knows?

Jay Kaeppel Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro client.

Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

Weekly and Daily MACD

December 20, 2017EDS, Stocks & Commodities traders tips, technical indicatoradmin

The AIQ code based on Vitali Apirine’s article in December 2017 issue of Stocks and Commodities magazine, “Weekly & Daily MACD,” is provided below.

The moving average convergence/divergence oscillator (MACD), developed by Gerald Appel, is one of the more popular technical analysis indicators. The MACD is typically used on a single timeframe, but what if we looked at two timeframes on one chart?

Traders can look for relative daily MACD line crossovers, weekly and daily centerline crossovers, and divergences to generate trading signals.

Figure 5 shows the daily & weekly MACD indicator on a chart of Apple Inc. (AAPL) during 2016 and 2017, when there was a change from a downtrend to an uptrend.

FIGURE 5: AIQ. Here is an example of the daily & weekly MACD on a chart of AAPL.

The code and EDS file can be downloaded from http://aiqsystems.com/dailyweeklyMACD.EDS, or copied here:

!WEEKLY & DAILY MACD
!Author: Vitali Apirine, TASC Dec 2017
!Coded by: Richard Denning 10/13/17
!www.TradersEdgeSystems.com

!INPUTS:
S is 12.
L is 25.

EMA1 is expavg([Close],S).
EMA2 is expavg([Close],L).
EMA3 is expavg([Close],S*5).
EMA4 is expavg([Close],L*5).
MACD is EMA1 - EMA2.
MACDW is EMA3 - EMA4.
rdMACD is MACD + MACDW.

—Richard Denning
info@TradersEdgeSystems.com
for AIQ Systems

A Candlestick Strategy With Soldiers And Crows

December 13, 2017back testing, EDSadmin

ndle reversal patterns—a bullish one white soldier and a bearish one black crow—that requ

The Expert Design Studio code for Jerry D’Ambrosio and Barbara Star’s article, “A Candlestick Strategy With Soldiers And Crows,” in Stocks & Commodities October 2018 issue is shown below.”Among the more well-known candlestick reversal patterns are soldiers and crows. These occur in a three-candle pattern such as three white soldiers or three black crows. Recently, on the website Candlesticker.com, we learned of two other candle reversal patterns—a bullish one white soldier and a bearish one black crow—that require fewer candles. ”

!A CANDLESTICK STRATEGY WITH SOLDIERS AND CROWS
!Author: Jerry D'Ambrosio & Barbara Star, TASC Oct 2017
!Coded by: Richard Denning 8/05/2017
!www.TradersEdgeSystems.com

!CODING ABBREVIATIONS:
O is [open].
O1 is valresult(O,1).
C is [close].
C1 is valresult(C,1).
C2 is valresult(C,2).
H is [high].
L is [low].
V is [volume].

!INPUTS:
minPriceBull is 1.
minPriceBear is 10.
minVolume is 1000. !in hundreds
volAvgLen is 50.
dayCount is 5.
longExitBars is 7.
shortExitBars is 1.

okToBuy if simpleavg(C,50) > simpleavg(C,200) or CminPriceBull and simpleavg(V,volAvgLen)>minVolume.
BullWS if C1C1 and C>O1 and O= longExitBars.

okToSell if simpleavg(C,50) < simpleavg(C,200) or C>simpleavg(C,200)*1.1.
okToSellMkt if TickerRule("SPX",okToSell).
PVfilterBear if C>minPriceBear and simpleavg(V,volAvgLen).
BearBC if C1>C2 and C1>O1 
     and OO1 
     and countof(C1>C2,dayCount)=dayCount
     and PVfilterBear and okToSellMkt.
ExitShort if {position days} >= shortExitBars.

I ran several backtests using the NASDAQ 100 list of stocks over the period from 8/04/2000 to 8/04/2017. I varied the following inputs to find the optimum set of parameters for the candlestick patterns. For longs, the “dayCount” = 5 with an “longExitBars” = 7 produced the best results, which is shown in Figure 5. For shorts, the “dayCount” = 5 with a “shortExitBars” = 1 produced the best results, which is shown in Figure 6. Neither commission nor slippage were subtracted from the results.

Sample Chart

FIGURE 5: WINWAY. EDS summary report for longs only.

Sample Chart

FIGURE 6: WINWAY. EDS summary report for shorts only.

—Richard Denning
info@TradersEdgeSystems.com
for TradingExpert Pro

ire fewer candles. “

Bitcoin May Rise Another 20-fold, But First….

December 13, 2017educational newsletters, jay kaeppeladmin

First off, for the record I am an “Old Dog” and Bitcoin is a “New Trick”. That creates a problem right there. The truth is also that can’t honestly say that I fully understand what Bitcoin actually is or how it actually works (which technically means I am in pretty good company with a lot of people who are actually trading it, but I digress). And as a “grizzled veteran” (of the markets) there is a part of me that instinctively wants to dismissively shout “bubble” and sneeringly walk away. It’s not like it hasn’t been seen before – tulip bulbs, the Nifty 50, silver, technology/dot.com stocks, interest only mortgages and so on.

Most of you know the drill:

*Some form of “investment” catches lightning in a bottle

*The investment world (for lack of a more professional phrase) “wet’s itself”

*Price soars beyond all rational levels

You know, sort of like what you see in Figure 1…

Figure 1 – Bitcoin price (Bitcoin.com)

…And then it all ultimately plummets painfully to earth.

Well, at least temporarily. I mean sure tulip bubbles never ascended the heights again, but a lot of the Nifty 50 went on to still be major companies even after their stock cratered. The same for a lot of the major dot.com era companies. Silver is still trading as a serious commodity and real estate seems to have rebounded.

In sum: Is Bitcoin forming a price “bubble”? It’s hard to look at Figure 1 and not think so. Of course, even if it is the questions no one can answer for sure are “When” and “from what level”?

The other question is “if it is a bubble and the bubble bursts, will crypto currencies go the way of tulip bulbs (as an investment) or is there a future for them in the long run?”

A Recent Bubble History Lesson

In the late 90’s into 2000 a bubble formed in tech stocks. And the bubble burst and it was ugly. And many “hot” companies folded and vanished. But not all of them and certainly not the major players. And certainly not the industry as a whole. Like I said before I don’t truly understand Bitcoin and crypto currencies. So I can’t say for sure if they are a “craze” – like tulip bulbs in the 1600’s during “Tulipmania” or something more viable and sustainable – like technology stocks. To understand why this distinction matters, consider the stocks listed in Figure 2.

Figure 2 – Dot.com bubble stocks that survived and thrived

As you can see in Figure 2 through 7 each of these stocks experienced a “bubble” and a “crash”. Interestingly, the companies themselves ultimately rebounded and thrived.

The average “crash” was -87% and the average post-crash advance (so far) is about 16,000%.

Figure 3 – Apple (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Figure 4 – Amazon (CourtesyAIQ TradingExpert)

Figure 5 – Microsoft (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Figure 6 – Nvidia (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Figure 7 – Priceline (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Summary

The only thing we can say for sure is that some people will make a great deal of money from Bitcoin/crypto currencies and others will likely get wiped out. The danger is obvious: whenever you have a lot of investors “chasing” something – especially something that many of them don’t even understand – it is a recipe for trouble.

That being said, in my (market addled) mind the real “long-term” question is, will crypto currencies still be “a thing” after the bottom falls out? If Bitcoin is a bubble, then if history is a guide we can look or a decline in price somewhere in the 80% to 99% range after the top is ultimately made.

From there, if history is also a guide then depending on whether or not crypto currencies prove to be a viable thing, we can expect them to either:

a) Vanish altogether

b) Rise 15-20 fold from the bottom

So here is my Bitcoin/crypto currency investing guide:

*It is OK to pile in and buy Bitcoin in hopes of getting rich (as long as you do not “bet the ranch”, invest only a small portion of your capital and acknowledge that a 100% loss is absolutely a possibility and that you are willing and able to accept that risk).

*It is also OK to sneer and shout “bubble” and not invest. But if and when the bottom drops out and prices crater remember to peruse the wreckage. There just might be an opportunity there (remember, Priceline lost -99% when the dot.com bubble burst, then gained 32,000%).

In any event, hold on tight people, this is NOT going to be a smooth ride.

Jay Kaeppel Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro client.

A Bottom-Picking Portfolio

November 14, 2017ETFS, group and sector, jay kaeppeladmin

In a recent article I highlighted some stocks that appeared to have a chance of “putting in a low”. In another article, I highlighted the potential usefulness of “horizontal lines” on a chart. The phrase “putting in a low” is essentially a kindler, gentler version of the phrase “Hey, let’s pick a bottom”.

The reality is that the ability to “pick tops and/or bottoms” on any kind of a consistent basis is a skill that roughly 99.2% of all investors and traders do not possess. That being said, there is such a thing as a legitimate “bottom formation” (at least in my market addled opinion). A security that bounces several or more times off a particular price is sending information that the sellers may be running out of ammunition. These levels can be observed by drawing horizontal trend lines across a price chart – connecting recent highs and/or lows at roughly similar prices.

“Loading up” in this situation is not recommended. But committing an acceptable percentage of one’s portfolio (a level which each investor must decide on their own) to such opportunities is a perfectly acceptable form of speculation.

So for arguments sake, below is a “Bottom Pickers Portfolio”. As always, I am not recommending this as an investment, simply highlighting an alternative idea for your further consideration.

The Tickers

The tickers included in this portfolio are mostly all commodity related. That is not a purposeful choice; they simply “fit the model”.

First is ticker BAL – an ETF that tracks the price of cotton futures. The critical level for BAL is roughly the $43.50 area.

Figure 1 – Ticker BAL (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Ticker GDX tracks a gold stock index and has been consolidating in a relatively tight range after last year’s sharp rally and subsequent pullback.

Figure 2 – Ticker GDX (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Ticker JO tracks the price of coffee futures. This is one of the weakest charts on the list and is dangerously close to failing to the downside. However, if the low holds this will strengthen the outlook a great deal.

Figure 3 – Ticker JO (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Ticker SGG tracks the price of sugar futures. SGG has been consolidating in a narrow range for about four months. Key price levels on the downside are $26.50 and the August 2015 low of $24.79.

Figure 4 – Ticker SGG (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Ticker SWN is Southwestern Energy Co. After a long, devastating decline the stock is attempting to form a low in the $5 a share range.

Figure 5 – Ticker SWN (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Ticker UNG tracks natural gas futures. Thanks to the advent of fracking – which is made natural gas abundantly available – the price of natural gas has collapsed in recent years. In the past week it retested its 2016 low and then ticked higher. Like JO, this one is precariously close to “failing”. But for now…

Figure 6 – Ticker UNG (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

The Bottom Pickers Portfolio

I use AIQ TradingExpert software to create my own “Groups”. So I created one called “Lows” to include the six tickers above. The group consists of an equal dollar investment in each ticker. The chart for this combination of tickers appears in Figure 7.EDITORS NOTE: Creating your own groups is accomplished in the TradingExpert Data Manager information can be found in this article ‘Adding groups and sectors to your Group/Sector List’

Figure 7 – The “Lows” Group (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Summary

Let me be blunt. There is every chance that the majority of the tickers highlighted above will continue their long-term bearish trends and break down to the downside causing further losses for those holding these shares.

The primary thing to highlight in this piece is a personal preference. I prefer “horizontal” lines on a chart – i.e., straight across, left to right – to the more typical slanted trend lines that most traders use. The reason is simply – upward or downward slanting trend lines require a trader to decide which two (or more) highs (or lows) to connect in order to draw the trend line. At the end of the day this is often a subjective decision.

Horizontal trend lines – which connect to (at least roughly equal) highs or lows – are generated by the market itself and as such, are more objective in nature. In other words, investor buying and selling determines these levels.

Will my “Bottom Pickers Portfolio” move to the upside or fail to the downside? We’ll just have to wait to find out.

Jay Kaeppel Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro client.